top of page

THE FUTURE OF SPORTS CARS IS BECOMING INCREASINGLY EXCLUSIVE

Writer: Simone Marchetti Cavalieri
Simone Marchetti Cavalieri
2 hours ago
4 min read


Over the past few days, two highly anticipated cars have been unveiled: the new Porsche Mission S and the Tesla Roadster, back in the spotlight after the prototype first revealed in 2017 never made it into production. Unsurprisingly, social media and automotive publications have been flooded with pictures, videos, technical breakdowns, and commentary about these two cars.


In my opinion, however, these unveilings tell us much more than the technical specifications of two dream cars. They offer two particularly clear examples of where the global automotive industry is heading.


On one side, we have Porsche, a historic automaker that has invested heavily, arguably too heavily, in electrifying its lineup, partly as a result of European policies that I consider deeply questionable. The brand is now facing commercial challenges and, to some extent, an identity crisis, seemingly determined to reconsider some of its previous decisions. On the other side stands Tesla, the quintessential electric car manufacturer, with Elon Musk continuing to promote a vision of the automobile focused on the future, betting on a technology that still accounts for a minority share of the global market.


But looking at these two cars individually reveals something even more interesting.

The Mission S seems to confirm just how reluctant the sports car and supercar segments are to embrace fully electric powertrains, despite the extraordinary performance they can deliver. The Roadster, meanwhile, demonstrates how difficult it has become to make a battery-powered supercar truly desirable based solely on outrageous horsepower figures and breathtaking acceleration. To capture people's attention, manufacturers now have to promise something more, even going as far as suggesting features that are difficult to imagine in real-world driving, such as the ability to make a car fly.


The point is that we've reached a stage of technological development where outright performance is no longer necessarily a defining characteristic. Today, even relatively affordable electric vehicles can deliver acceleration figures that, until just a few years ago, were reserved for extremely expensive supercars. Raw performance has become much more commonplace and, precisely because of that, has lost some of its ability to impress.


Just look at the Ferrari F80 or the McLaren W1. Two extraordinary feats of engineering that, nevertheless, don't seem to have generated the same impact as the so-called Holy Trinity, consisting of the McLaren P1, Porsche 918 Spyder, and LaFerrari. Back then, those three cars represented an enormous leap in performance compared to most of the automotive industry. Today, however, that perceived gap is considerably smaller.


More importantly, the essence of a sports car has relatively little to do with its 0–60 mph time, quarter-mile performance, or a flying lap around the Nürburgring.

People looking for a particular kind of driving experience aren't necessarily interested in owning the fastest car available. Instead, they're looking for the satisfaction of controlling a mechanical, preferably analog machine, one that demands skill, sensitivity, and genuine involvement from the driver. A car that depends on the person behind the wheel, rather than the other way around.


It's no coincidence that the restomod market is experiencing remarkable success, along with growing interest in numerous used sports cars, including relatively recent models from an era before the widespread adoption of intrusive electronic driver-assistance systems and hybrid powertrains. These cars are often less capable in terms of outright performance, yet they deliver a level of engagement that many modern vehicles have gradually sacrificed.


And that's precisely why I continue to believe that the very concept of a fully electric supercar is rather questionable. Not because the technology is inferior, quite the opposite, but because it is unlikely to ever deliver the same sensations as a combustion-powered sports car with a quarter of the horsepower and significantly less impressive performance figures.


Of course, this reasoning cannot be indiscriminately applied to the entire automotive industry. A small gas-powered city car, for example, offers very few technical advantages over an equivalent electric vehicle when considering urban driving alone. These are different environments with different requirements, where the same technology cannot necessarily represent the best solution.


And it seems that several automakers are finally beginning to understand that.

I therefore believe that the future of the automobile, and partly that of motorsport as well, is destined to follow two parallel paths, increasingly distinct and difficult to reconcile. On one side, everyday transportation, moving toward electrification, efficiency, and automation. On the other, the sports car as an emotional object, destined to preserve mechanical characteristics and driving sensations that the technological transition might otherwise eliminate.


The problem is that this separation could have consequences that are far from positive for enthusiasts with ordinary financial means.


Manufacturers like Porsche seem to have realized, partly through mistakes and strategic reversals, that focusing on ultra-high-end vehicles, produced in limited numbers and offering substantial profit margins, can be far more profitable than continuing to invest in the development of relatively affordable sports cars.

Fewer cars, higher prices, and a customer base increasingly defined by purchasing power.


The real risk, then, is witnessing the gradual disappearance of small, lightweight, affordable sports cars, the very vehicles that, for decades, allowed younger drivers and enthusiasts with limited financial resources to experience the joy of driving.


There was a time when buying a Porsche 911 could represent an achievable dream after years of hard work and sacrifice. In the future, the financial gap between enthusiasts and this kind of car may become increasingly difficult to bridge. Meanwhile, the lower end of the market could see its sports car offerings shrink dramatically, potentially to the point of becoming virtually nonexistent.


The paradox is that while technology is making automotive performance accessible to an ever-growing audience, the pleasure of traditional sports car driving risks becoming a privilege reserved for the wealthy few.


Dream cars will probably become even more extraordinary, exclusive, and expensive. At least they'll continue to make noise, and certain motorsport categories may also benefit from the survival of internal combustion engines.


For everyone else, however, the alternatives may become increasingly limited.

And perhaps that's the most concerning aspect of all: not so much the potential disappearance of combustion-powered sports cars, but the gradual disappearance of combustion-powered sports cars that ordinary people can realistically afford.



© Simone Marchetti Cavalieri

 
 

© Cavalieri Garage® & Co.
Privacy Policy - Cookie Policy - Legal Notes

Cavalieri Garage® & Co. is not sponsored, associated, endorsed, promoted, or affiliated in any way with the automotive brands mentioned. The brands and emblems, as well as other products mentioned, are trademarks of their respective owners. Any mention of brand names or other trademarks is for reference purposes only. Cavalieri Garage® & Co. restores and modifies existing cars for its clients at licensed workshops. Cavalieri Garage® & Co. does not manufacture or sell cars. All training programs are reserved for members of Cavalieri Garage Motorpsort ASD. The magazine section does not represent a journalistic publication as it is updated without any regular frequency. Therefore, it cannot be considered an editorial product under italian law no. 62 of 03/07/2001.

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
bottom of page